
On their books have been written much, and still gladly I would add something, but not necessarily at the moment. Helps us moment at which it is fairly even most beloved books, have gathered in each direction. And yet the desire to retain their atmosphere remains - it is time for numerous film adaptations, which, unfortunately, much of it is unpleasant experience. About ekranizacjach (all that I've seen), even "Wuthering Heights" I have a lot to say, but nothing good. Yes, even the famous movie of 1992 has failed me terribly, Fiennes and Binoche is a pair of very talented actors, but in my imagination, "Wuthering Heights" fit like a fist to the nose. Or unsolvable riddle
old Hollywood, why it was Laurence Olivier, had to play both Mr Darcy and Rochester (and the additive is still Mr. De Winter ! horror!), when these roles are not suited completely?
"Pride and Prejudice" is doing on the screen a bit better, version of 2005 is my favorite (Macfadyen was a hit, in general, a better cast of this adaptation is unlikely to have hits.)
A "Mansfield Park" is a much better movie than a book a novel, was bored to death while reading like a pug. O "Persuasion" as a paper and film have a lot to say, so it may also be another time.
But otherwise submit to "Emma", when to reach for a movie, and two more adaptations of "Emma" in the same year 1996, version of the television and cinema.
Douglas McGrath has done everything as it should, he gathered a good cast (Gwyneth Paltrow, Toni Collette, Alan Cumming, Jeremy Northam and the like), chose the books relevant moments, deftly missing the boring and tedious passages. Then they were dressed nice, nicely filmed and pieced together into a whole against the picturesque backdrop widoczków. I went out this really good movie, funny, mischievous, funny, visually inviting for immediate purchase land in England.
best sums up the character Emma certainly Mr. Knightley, saying (loosely quoted) that it considers not to have to have something to learn, exactly.

And so I would have to live peacefully, but in ignorance, thinking that "Emma," directed by McGrath's film is good, and when I compared it to other Austen film adaptation, it becomes even better, although perhaps a bit of candy. So pretty.
But! Yesterday I fell into the hands of the film version of a television production course, English, and my world was overturned. Or at least a piece of the world for "Emma", as that version was in almost every way better and the dexterity of the cinematic counterpart.
Mark Strong as Mr. Knightley was surprisingly smart choice, together with a young Kate Beckinsale formed a duo with no defects. Peaceful nature of the long-standing knowledge of Emma and Knightley, interspersed with moments of his critical comments and her smiles, "I know better", fell far more natural, without the pomposity of Hollywood's ubiquitous loveliness. In the end it came to me slowly uświadamianej pronunciation of this love, Knightley was, after all much older than his trzpiotowatej wybranki, and their ratio is presented as Strong / Beckinsale much more interesting than the alternative embodiment.
course content of both films are almost twins, but they can not refute the impression that the theatrical version that contains an unfortunate Hollywood ghost, which makes everything nicer, easier and sweeter. A little less intelligent and a little more fun.
Although not deny that when it comes to scenery, costumes, locations, even pictures and all the other small stuff that make up the visual reception of the film, the U.S. version beats telewizjyjną production per capita.
delight over this "Emma" would not have to end, the subtlety of the acting, the cast for final assembly, which now seems obvious to me (who better than Samantha Morton as Hariett? Who grateful to than Olivia Williams as Jane?) restraint on the scene, which in this second "Emmie" like suddenly antics. But entry must end in an already over-stretched it is.
scribbling sent I hope the above is what I wanted: a "Emma" is good, but the latter is so much better! And so, admit that Mr. Knightley is my favorite, favorite gentleman with a sizeable crowd of the created by Austen, so doubly appreciate the fact that the Mark of the Parties entirely conquered me in this role, completely surprised me, because I know him only from the movies Ritchie . And here you go, grace, style, deep look ... Well, well:)
And so it was not, Romola Garai and Jonny Le Miller in the 2009 version This year ha, ha, I guess not. I've seen and strongly deny the positive comments.
0 comments:
Post a Comment